Government Says Consumer Prices Fell, But I Ain’t Buyin’ Any Of That!

Courtesy of Lee Adler of the Wall Street Examiner

There’s something very fishy about the July CPI data. The BLS reported that the July headline number was flat versus June. That was significant because pundits concluded that this would give the Fed room to do more QE. Supposedly contributing to the decline was a 0.3% decline in energy prices.

That caught my eye. “Wait a minute!” I thought. I drive a car and I distinctly remember gas prices being low late in the spring, and going up ever since. So to test my memory I went to the US Energy Administration website to get a reading on real time gas prices. Sure enough, my memory was correct. Gas prices had risen by 4% over the course of the month. That’s not 4% annualized. It’s 4% for the month of July alone. I don’t know whether this was just a matter of the date when the July CPI data was collected or something else, but the fact is what it is. Energy prices, as measured by the national mean retail price  retail price were up by about 4% in July.

US Energy Information Agency Weekly Average Retail Gas Price - Click to enlarge

US Energy Information Agency Weekly Average Retail Gas Price – Click to enlarge

And it has not gotten any better in August. From July 30 through August 13 the national average retail price per gallon rose from 3.568 to 3.779, a gain of 5.9% in 2 weeks. So regardless of whether this is just a matter of the CPI data having been collected in early July reflecting a June decline, or something else, the data is no longer relevant. It’s old news.  The pundits are wrong as usual. This is not an excuse for the Fed to do more QE.

If the energy component was that misleading, I have to wonder if the other components weren’t off by just as much.  I don’t know about you, but I ain’t buying it! And judging by the 70 basis point jump in Treasury yields today, neither are bond investors.

Get regular updates the machinations of the Fed, Treasury, Primary Dealers and foreign central banks in the US market, in the Fed Report in the Professional Edition, Money Liquidity, and Real Estate Package. Click this link to try WSE's Professional Edition risk free for 30 days!

Copyright © 2012 The Wall Street Examiner. All Rights Reserved. The above may be reposted with attribution and a prominent link to the Wall Street Examiner.

Did you like this? Share it:


  1. Hi W, Yes, I completely agree with you. I edited a number of articles on that by Bruce Krasting who also discusses that issue. And there’s also the ability to shrink package sizes, but leave the price the same, which does not get measured as inflation…. It’s so dishonest that it’s unbelievable that it isn’t intentional. ~ Ilene

  2. You’re not buying it…. it’s too expensaive now.

  3. Under BLS’s ‘substitution’ policy they never have to admit inflation occurs.

    The BLS simply assumes if something goes up in price that you’ll simply buy a cheaper alternative.

    Always bought Mercedes or Lexus at $60,000? Simply start driving a KIA and your cost of living goes way down. Presto…a negative inflation rate.

    Normal people do not measure COLA that way nor should they.

Speak Your Mind

%d bloggers like this: